Legal issues in amateur and professional sports.


Payday loans

Legal Dispute over “Who Dat” Catch Phrase Reaches Settlement


Posted on 7th February, in Intellectual Property. No Comments

The following article was written by Spencer Wingate.

“Who Dat?”, Inc. has reached a settlement with the NFL/New Orleans Saints over their trademark dispute. The settlement effectively dismisses the lawsuit and means the two will work together. From this point forward, all merchandise with the catch phrase will be co-branded by both parties.

The legal battle began when the NFL issued cease-and-desist letters to New Orleans vendors selling “Who Dat” merchandise. The NFL claimed they held trademark rights and would sue the companies if they did not stop selling the merchandise. After local outrage and support from the state congressional delegation, the NFL backed off their stance. Then Steve and Sal Monistere, founders of “Who Dat?”, Inc., stepped in. They filed lawsuits against the NFL and companies using “Who Dat.” The Monistere brothers referenced how they trademarked the phrase with the Louisiana Secretary of State in 1983. They had trademarked “Who Dat” before releasing a song with the phrase that became popular at football games. Their suits claimed the other parties had committed trademark infringement by engaging in business using the phrase. The Monistere brothers stated they have other partners who pay them royalties when they sell “Who Dat” gear. One example noted was their negotiation with a Saints Fan Club in 1988 to use the phrase.

The voluntary agreement between “Who Dat?”, Inc. and the NFL does not mean everyone is free to use the phrase.

Who Dat Inc. has not settled legal battles with four companies regarding trademark rights. Lauren Thom, who wants to use “Who Dat” on her Fleurty Girl apparel, is still in a legal dispute with the Monistere brothers. She states all the settlement means is the NFL is no longer on her side.

The origination of the popular saying is of key concern in the remaining lawsuits. The source has been left for debate. Its citation ranges from a popular school chant in the 1970s and 80s all the way back to 19th century literature. Thom and others contend a single entity like “Who Dat?”, Inc. can not claim ownership of something that has been in the public domain for so long.

 





Leave a Reply



Published Contributions

The following Sports Law related articles have been selected to be published on Sport-in-Law. Articles displayed are the most recent contributions to this website. Please click here to discover additional articles posted on Sport-in-Law.

Could Carter’s Clothing v. Nike Lead to Antitrust Litigation?

The following article was written by Benjamin Haynes, Esq.

This is David vs. Goliath. On one hand, you have Carter’s Clothing and Footwear, a...